Role of Authors in Scientific Articles

 

Importance of authorship in scientific communication

Authorship refers to the acknowledgment of individuals who have made significant contributions to a research project, presentation, or publication. It typically includes those involved in conceptualization, methodology, analysis, and writing of scientific works. In the academic context, authorship establishes both the legal and ethical responsibility of the authors.

When writing research articles, authorship can recognize people who worked on the research; contribute to the trustworthiness of the research; lead to better opportunities and recognition; help readers identify potential biases and conflicts of interest; promote teamwork and innovative research.

The significance of authorship goes beyond just giving credit to individuals. It is closely linked to the integrity and transparency of scientific research, influencing both present studies and future works. As we explore the details of authorship practices (including criteria for authorship, ethical issues, and the consequences of authorship disputes), it becomes essential to understand these factors for effectively navigating today’s research environment.

 

Who qualifies as an author?

Establishing clear criteria for authorship is important to ensure transparency in scholarly communication. These criteria help define the roles and responsibilities of authors, guiding them through proper conduct in the research and publication processes.

Specific criteria for authorship generally include the following:

  1. Substantial contribution: authorship requires significant contribution to the conception, design, writing, or interpretation of the research project.
  2. Drafting the article: authors must be involved in drafting or critically revising the manuscript for an original intellectual content.
  3. Final approval: all authors must approve the final version of the manuscript to be published.
  4. Compliance with ethical standards: authors must meet any applicable ethical standards, such as obtaining necessary approvals for research.

All these criteria must be observed in order to qualify a researcher as authors in scientific papers. Authorship guidelines of scientific papers are officially indicated on the websites of organizations like the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Besides, you should always consult the instructions for authors on the journal page.

There can also be non-author contributors. These are people who help with a research project but do not qualify to be listed as authors. They can include research assistants, lab technicians, or people who provided equipment. These contributors aren’t listed as authors because they didn’t make significant decisions about the study or its writing. Instead, their efforts are often recognized in a special section of the research paper called acknowledgments.

By adhering to established authorship criteria, researchers and journals can promote transparency, accountability, and fairness in the publication of research findings.

 

How to order authors in a research article?

Ordering authors in a research article is an important aspect of academic writing, as it reflects the contributions and roles of each scientist involved in the project.

See also  How to Publish an Article in Scopus indexed journals? A Comprehensive Guide: 9 Major Steps

First author in scientific papers online is often regarded as a significant indicator of an individual’s contribution to research, as it typically reflects the person who made the primary intellectual effort and played a leading role in the research process, handling much of the data collection or analysis, and taking the main responsibility for writing the manuscript. First author on scientific papers often dedicates substantial time, making their contribution vital to the project’s success.

The last author is typically the person who contributed the least to the research paper. However, they can also hold a supervisory or senior role, such as the principal investigator or head of the research team. This person provides guidance, resources, and overall oversight throughout the research process.

Authors listed in between the first and last positions are generally ordered based on their specific contributions. Researchers often look for joint authorship scientific papers samples to understand the collaborative dynamics and contribution levels that constitute successful co-authorship in academic publishing.

It’s important for all contributors to engage in open discussions about authorship order prior to submission to ensure that everyone feels fairly represented and acknowledged. This fosters a transparent environment and helps avoid potential disputes later on.

Coauthoring scientific papers and presentations typically involves collaborative efforts among researchers, where each contributor brings their expertise to the project, sharing responsibilities and resulting in a comprehensive and well-written publication.

In one of our previous texts, we have prepared materials about co-authorship in scientific publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) journals. Please, refer to it to learn more about your co-authorship opportunities.

What is also important when writing authors in a research article?

  1. Names: include full names of all authors. Typically, this is the first name followed by the last name.
  2. Affiliations: list each author’s institutional affiliation directly below their names. This often includes the department, institution, and location.
  3. Corresponding author: designate one author as the corresponding author, who will handle communication about the article. This is often indicated with an asterisk (*) or a note.
  4. Formatting: follow the specific formatting guidelines of the journal you are submitting to, as requirements may vary. This includes punctuation, italicization, and whether or not to use the full title “Dr.” or “Prof.”

By adhering to the guidelines, you ensure a clear and professional presentation of authorship in your research article.

 

Ethical responsibilities of authors

With the evolving landscape of research practices and the increasing use of collaborative methods, understanding the ethical responsibilities associated with authorship has become essential.

Authorship criteria are closely related to ethical issues, particularly in research involving human subjects, as it directly impacts the accountability and transparency of research findings. Below you’ll see main ethical issues which may influence authors’ reputation.

Plagiarism and intellectual property: misrepresentation of contributions can lead to plagiarism and loss of intellectual property rights.

Conflict of interest: authors may have conflicts of interest, which can impact the validity or reliability of the research if not properly disclosed.

See also  Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2022 for Annual Updated Metrics in the Web of Science

Misattribution of authorship: excluding contributors or including non-contributors as authors can compromise the accuracy and validity of the research.

Ghostwriting: authors can hire writers to articulate their ideas, but the ghostwriter remains anonymous, therefore, the research can be compromised.

Authorship disputes: Disagreements over authorship can lead to delays in publication, damage to reputation, and potential loss of research funding.

Inadequate disclosure: Failure to disclose funding sources, conflicts of interest, or contributions to the research can undermine the credibility of researchers and their research.

Ensuring ethical authorship practices is crucial for maintaining the integrity of research, fostering trust within the scientific community. Ethical authorship practices prevent falsification of contributions, facilitate accurate attribution of ideas and innovations, and advance the quality and credibility of scientific literature, ultimately contributing to the advancement of knowledge.

 

AI as an author of the research article

Nowadays, modern technologies pose one more issue in the context of scientific articles authorship — artificial intelligence as an author of a research article. In fact, it still raises important ethical and practical questions.

The increasing use of AI in research gives rise to discussions about how to attribute contributions made by neural networks. Some propose labeling AI-generated sections clearly and declare using the tool or software, rather than giving authorship to the AI itself. Others strictly prohibit the use of artificial intelligence in preparing research papers. Publishers and academic institutions are exploring guidelines and policies to address these complexities, aiming to balance innovation with ethical standards. Current conventions typically require authors to take responsibility for the work and its implications, which AI cannot do.

 

Challenges in authorship and how to avoid them

As a collaborative process, article writing involves not only the creation of original work but also the allocation of responsibilities. With the rise of joint research projects and creative partnerships, lots of challenges may be faced by scientists. These issues can range from disputes over who qualifies for authorship, to challenges in defining the roles of each contributor and ethical concerns. These can lead to conflict and a breakdown in collaboration.

Disputes over authorship may arise regarding who qualifies for authorship and in what order, leading to interpersonal tensions among collaborators. A lack of clear communication about expectations regarding contributions may result in misunderstandings and unintentional exclusions of key contributors. Different fields may have varying standards of authorship, leading to inconsistencies in authorship practices. Pressure to publish can force researchers to engage in unethical practices around authorship.

You can ask about how to avoid these challenges. Here are some tips:

  • Sign a clear authorship agreement (even in a written form);
  • Make regular meetings and discussions with all contributors;
  • Carefully read instructions on joint authorship in scientific papers;
  • Use authorship checklists by ICMJE or COPE to confirm that all authors meet the criteria for authorship before submission.

 

Changes to authorship

May the authors change authorship in their research article?

See also  What is Elsevier?

Authors changing authorship in a published research article is a complex and sensitive issue, often governed by specific guidelines. It happens rarely and only if the reason is well-justified.

Situations where authorship changes are considered:

  • Discrepancies in contributions: if there is evidence of a substantial contribution by someone not listed as an author or an omission of an author’s contribution, a re-evaluation of authorship may be warranted.
  • Conflict of interest disclosure: if a conflict of interest not originally disclosed becomes apparent, changes in authorship may be necessary to ensure transparency.
  • Author removal: if an author is accused of misconduct or has been found guilty of violating research ethics, removal of that author from the publication may be considered.

 

When are authorship changes not recommended?

  • Minor Errors: minor errors or typos in the author list do not necessarily justify a change in authorship.
  • Changes in employment: employment changes or institutional affiliations do not typically justify altering authorship.
  • Request from a single author: if only one author from the original list requests a change, it may not be justified, unless evidence supports the request.

ICMJE and COPE offer general guidelines regarding authorship changes, and journals should display this information prominently on their official websites.

ICMJE Recommendations outline that issues to add or remove authors from a published article should be addressed to the journal editor, who will review the request based on the provided evidence. COPE Guidelines request for a consent signed by all co-authors to make any changes in authorship (deletion, addition, order, etc.). Each journal has its own journal-specific policies for handling requests to alter authorship, so it is essential to consult the journal guidelines.

What changes can be done?

Changes to authorship in a published research article may include several actions, each with specific considerations and guidelines: author deletion / addition, changing a corresponding author or authorship order, author name corrections, affiliations update, changing contributions.

When are the changes to authorship allowed?

Changes in authorship are generally possible at different stages of the publication process, but the rules can vary by journal.

Before submission, authors can make changes to the authorship list freely, as long as all contributors agree on their roles. Changes can still be made after submission but before acceptance, particularly to correct errors or address disputes. However, it’s essential to notify the journal editor and provide a clear explanation for the changes, as well as get agreement from all involved authors. Some journals allow for authorship changes after acceptance but before publication, but formal notification to the journal is required, along with the consent of all authors involved. After publication, changes become more complicated and typically require a formal correction or retraction. Authors must provide substantial justification for any changes post-publication.

Changing authorship in a published research article is typically considered under specific circumstances and should follow the journal’s guidelines, ICMJE recommendations, or COPE guidelines. Any changes to the author list should be handled with caution and in consultation with the journal editor to maintain the integrity of the research.